Difference between revisions of "Talk:Soul Seeker"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The note says that it was nerfed, but the figures presented indicate that the weapon was enhanced. --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 18:12, 17 January 2008 (PST) | The note says that it was nerfed, but the figures presented indicate that the weapon was enhanced. --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 18:12, 17 January 2008 (PST) | ||
:Thanks Galen, that make much more sense. --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 18:40, 17 January 2008 (PST) | :Thanks Galen, that make much more sense. --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 18:40, 17 January 2008 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The use of nerfed in this case is VERY misleading, especially since that it did not cause this weapon to fall out of use. | ||
| + | In fact, it is MORE useful in many templates, even at the lower leech levels, because they are triggering every swing. | ||
| + | The whole section on it being nerfed is personal opinion, and should not be in the description. | ||
Latest revision as of 05:56, 21 February 2009
The note says that it was nerfed, but the figures presented indicate that the weapon was enhanced. --Ceruleus 18:12, 17 January 2008 (PST)
- Thanks Galen, that make much more sense. --Ceruleus 18:40, 17 January 2008 (PST)
The use of nerfed in this case is VERY misleading, especially since that it did not cause this weapon to fall out of use. In fact, it is MORE useful in many templates, even at the lower leech levels, because they are triggering every swing. The whole section on it being nerfed is personal opinion, and should not be in the description.