Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline"
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date. [[User:Nimuaq|Nimuaq]] 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | :I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date. [[User:Nimuaq|Nimuaq]] 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events. --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:08, 15 May 2010
Should we continue this? --Merion 13:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date. Nimuaq 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events. --Ceruleus 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC)