Difference between revisions of "UOGuide talk:Directory"

(wiki pages)
m (Organization)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
: i'm more used to working with dark pages, so blue and other colors generally work better.
 
: i'm more used to working with dark pages, so blue and other colors generally work better.
 
: white is hard to work with tbh. {{:User:BBR/Sig}} 22:51, 15 November 2006 (PST)
 
: white is hard to work with tbh. {{:User:BBR/Sig}} 22:51, 15 November 2006 (PST)
 +
 +
I think there needs to be a section for Artifacts, the same way there is a section for Item Sets. -- [[User:Cogniac|Cogniac]] 22:10, 28 December 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
I have no idea what the Creatures section is supposed to be. Haha. -- [[User:Cogniac|Cogniac]] 1:43, 29 December 2006 (EST)
 +
: The directory is very much a work in progress. You are right about the creatures section being pointless. [[User:JC the Builder|JC the Builder]] 22:57, 28 December 2006 (PST)
  
 
== wiki pages ==
 
== wiki pages ==

Latest revision as of 22:57, 28 December 2006

Organization

I think full headings for each section looks much nicer. Also, the color scheme does not look that great to me. I can't think offhand what might be better though. -- JC the Builder 15:23, 15 November 2006 (PST)

i'm more used to working with dark pages, so blue and other colors generally work better.
white is hard to work with tbh.  - BBR  talk / cont 22:51, 15 November 2006 (PST)

I think there needs to be a section for Artifacts, the same way there is a section for Item Sets. -- Cogniac 22:10, 28 December 2006 (EST)

I have no idea what the Creatures section is supposed to be. Haha. -- Cogniac 1:43, 29 December 2006 (EST)

The directory is very much a work in progress. You are right about the creatures section being pointless. JC the Builder 22:57, 28 December 2006 (PST)

wiki pages

Making a list:

More to come.  - BBR  talk / cont 00:07, 16 November 2006 (PST)