Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gems"

(New page: == Chance of brilliant amber == The article can lead to wrong info: the flat 0.6% is only about mining special resources. Brilliant amber chance is way low than 0.6% I have tested in OSI...)
 
(info)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
Of course, the number is too little to make a serious validation of chance to harvest lumberjacking resources, especially about brilliant amber where I was able to find only one. Anyway, it's unlikely to be the 0.6% this article indicates. Much probably is 0.1%, or less.
 
Of course, the number is too little to make a serious validation of chance to harvest lumberjacking resources, especially about brilliant amber where I was able to find only one. Anyway, it's unlikely to be the 0.6% this article indicates. Much probably is 0.1%, or less.
 
--[[User:Daedalus|Daedalus]] 21:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Daedalus|Daedalus]] 21:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== info ==
 +
 +
http://vboards.stratics.com/showthread.php?t=211632
 +
 +
[[User:Gettingbetter|Gettingbetter]] 17:42, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:42, 6 June 2010

Chance of brilliant amber

The article can lead to wrong info: the flat 0.6% is only about mining special resources. Brilliant amber chance is way low than 0.6%

I have tested in OSI TC1 by chopping trees around 2000 times and these are number of resources I got:

On 2007 choppings:

  • bark fragment: 191 - 0.095 (near 10%)
  • luminescent fungi: 69 - 0.034 (near 3.5%)
  • switch = 40 - 0.019 (near 2%)
  • parasitic plant = 18 - 0.0089 (near 1%)
  • brilliant amber = 1 - 0.0004

Of course, the number is too little to make a serious validation of chance to harvest lumberjacking resources, especially about brilliant amber where I was able to find only one. Anyway, it's unlikely to be the 0.6% this article indicates. Much probably is 0.1%, or less. --Daedalus 21:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

info

http://vboards.stratics.com/showthread.php?t=211632

Gettingbetter 17:42, 6 June 2010 (UTC)