Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lumberjacking"
Valentiinro (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
According to my math, the Damage Increase figure is incorrect. Using the formula [http://uo.stratics.com/content/arms-armor/combat.php Lumberjack Damage Bonus% = Lumberjack ÷ 5 (Add 10% if Lumberjacking >= 100)], lumberjacking max dam increase (GM as there are no Lumberjacking Power Scrolls) is 22%, not 35%. Is Stratics, gasp, out of date? Or is UOGUIDE in error? --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 03:03, 31 December 2007 (PST) | According to my math, the Damage Increase figure is incorrect. Using the formula [http://uo.stratics.com/content/arms-armor/combat.php Lumberjack Damage Bonus% = Lumberjack ÷ 5 (Add 10% if Lumberjacking >= 100)], lumberjacking max dam increase (GM as there are no Lumberjacking Power Scrolls) is 22%, not 35%. Is Stratics, gasp, out of date? Or is UOGUIDE in error? --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 03:03, 31 December 2007 (PST) | ||
| − | Well, all the axe pages say 10% damage increase from gm lumberjacking. Which is it? | + | Well, all the axe pages say 10% damage increase from gm lumberjacking. Which is it? --[[User:Valentiinro|Valentiinro]] 01:24, January 17, 2009 |
| + | |||
| + | :Good question, Valentiinro. Anyone care to clarify on max dam bonus? --[[User:Ceruleus|Ceruleus]] 14:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:35, 17 April 2009
According to my math, the Damage Increase figure is incorrect. Using the formula Lumberjack Damage Bonus% = Lumberjack ÷ 5 (Add 10% if Lumberjacking >= 100), lumberjacking max dam increase (GM as there are no Lumberjacking Power Scrolls) is 22%, not 35%. Is Stratics, gasp, out of date? Or is UOGUIDE in error? --Ceruleus 03:03, 31 December 2007 (PST)
Well, all the axe pages say 10% damage increase from gm lumberjacking. Which is it? --Valentiinro 01:24, January 17, 2009
- Good question, Valentiinro. Anyone care to clarify on max dam bonus? --Ceruleus 14:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)