Talk:Monsters

Revision as of 13:25, 24 October 2008 by Meridus (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Note that according to normal wiki rules, most pages should be "singular", and contain glossary information about a subject(describe what a monster is), while categories provide a "list", such as is displayed on this page. Each "monster" should be added to the Category:Monsters once created, or stubbed, and give specific information about that particular creature.  - BBR  talk / cont 04:38, 11 January 2007 (PST)

For now, this can be used as a guide as to what pages need to be created rather then having a stub for every monster page. Right now I think the important thing is getting the content up. Fretting over spelling, grammar, page names, and the like can come later. It is important, but not so much that current pages need to be examined while neglecting the addition of new ones. Eventually I would like to have something called a "focus review", where sections are analyzed, properly wikified, and checked for accuracy. - JC the Builder 07:13, 11 January 2007 (PST)

Suspecious Extinct Creatures

Anyone know why Jwilson and Paladin are listed? --Ceruleus 09:02, 1 February 2008 (PST)

Wacked em both. --Ceruleus 00:10, 2 February 2008 (PST)

Humans section not appropriate for this page

This is a page for monsters, not a sub-category of them. Plus a Wandering Healer isn't a monster at all. The section should be removed and all entries shuffled into the master monster list. The Human section would be more appropriate on the Human page. - JC the Builder 12:45, 24 October 2008 (PDT)


That makes sense. I didn't want to mess with this page without imput. Meridus 14:25, 24 October 2008 (PDT)