Talk:Timeline
Should we continue this?
--Merion 13:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I think we should. The text is from one of the newsletters of Sept. 2003, so that's why the timeline stops at that date.
--Nimuaq 16:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)- I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events.
--Ceruleus 08:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC) - Should this include client updates, publishes, expansion releases, beta announcements and other historical stuff, like devs coming/departing? Would make for a very authoritative timeline of UO history.
--Tancred RedStar 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC) - I think every significant event that had an effect on the game should be here. But sure, not the EM or RP community events.
--Nimuaq 23:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)- "devs coming/departing" Great idea!
--Ceruleus 09:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- "devs coming/departing" Great idea!
- I agree as well. Do we want to state some sort of scope at the top of the article? Say, cross-shard official events, releases and the like? I wouldn't want to see this include shard- or guild-specific events.
http://www.simile-widgets.org/timeline/ <--If we can figure out a way to do this...
--Cogniac 17:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)