Talk:Publish 60

Should Publish 60.1 be considered it's own Publish or an update of Publish 60?

Seems they've(devs or Chrissay?) either forgotten or have forsaken the nomenclature of publishes after years of good practice.

Additionally, there are client changes pushed out, but theyre indicated as part of the publish.

*puffs pipe*

"back in my day, sonny, publishes were server code and bits and bytes on your 'puter were client updates!"

--Tancred RedStar 01:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Since we went with Publish 58.8 as it's own Publish, I'll follow that and add Publish 60.1 as it's own Publish

--Tancred RedStar 16:37, 18 September 2009 (UTC)